She doesn't have great tits anyway. She's thin, she has a beautiful face, but I don't think she's particularly sexy. Even if she did nude scenes, her skin is so heavily scrawled by tattoos that I don't think she's great jerk-off material.
I don't think she's angry about what's showing. What probably irks her is that she has no control or authority over these photographs and she or her reps want control over every aspect of her image. Basically loss of control equates to loss of revenue.
Uncle Scoopy some years ago commented on something similar to this, where a still from a French movie showed an actress in an unflattering light, he asked "Would any American actress allow the same?"
I looked around a bit, only Jennifer's Body came up. Funny thing, don't really care too much one way or the other.
ReplyDeleteShe doesn't have great tits anyway. She's thin, she has a beautiful face, but I don't think she's particularly sexy. Even if she did nude scenes, her skin is so heavily scrawled by tattoos that I don't think she's great jerk-off material.
ReplyDeleteSince that article is from 2010 (last year) I guess she was talking about the photo here: http://tinyurl.com/6xsa69b
ReplyDeletein which you see nothing.
I don't think she's angry about what's showing. What probably irks her is that she has no control or authority over these photographs and she or her reps want control over every aspect of her image. Basically loss of control equates to loss of revenue.
ReplyDeleteUncle Scoopy some years ago commented on something similar to this, where a still from a French movie showed an actress in an unflattering light, he asked "Would any American actress allow the same?"