Friday, June 12, 2009

Eyes up here, pervert - What Would Tyler Durden Do

Eyes up here, pervert (Catherine Zeta-Jones cleavage)

"A friend of mine does insurance for one of the big studios. When a movie is made she buys insurance on the actors and equipment and whatever. Obviously to do that she needs documentation on everyone. Real stuff, not the fakes they have made. Anyway, she said Jones is 12 years older than she claims. So, 51, and not 39 like her bio says. She looks pretty good for 51, but she’s standing next to George Washington - who should have died like 800 years ago - so that probably helps."

Although I can see that she seems to look quite a bit older than Heather Graham, who is supposed to be the same age, I don't buy into the 12 year theory. For one thing, that means her career began (1990) at age 33, not at age 21. Where was she before that? For another thing, she does not appear to have been 33 in that 1001 Nights movie she made back in the day to kick off her filmography. She may be older than she claims, I don't know, but (a) 12 years is a stretch; (b) there is nothing suspicious in her background that would support the position that she is older; (c) when a celeb is lying there is usually some evidence to refute the claims - yearbook pics, childhood friends, etc. I've seen nothing of the kind for Zeta.

If you want to look into a really strange alleged age, check out the supposed birthdate for Catherine McCormack, who is supposed to be 37 and, unlike Zeta, actually appears to be every bit of 50. She is supposed to be two years younger than Heather Graham, but if she played Heather's mother, nobody would question it for a second. Nobody has stepped forward to prove that McCormack is older, so I suppose she has just aged badly.

No comments:

Post a Comment